Thank you, Mr. Hoffmann, for clarifying this topic. I hope that the Western leadership understands that too. Ukraine is 100% entitled to strike these active Russian bomber fleets. Pure self-defence.
Thank you for this analysis. It would be great to hear in a future post what your assessment is of the impact of last week’s attack on Russia’s use of cruise missiles.
Thanks awfully Sir Hoffman for your insightful perspective about a much harder issue and a significantly strategic aspect of the nuclear deterrent of a superpower and the first ranked one worldwide.It's worth mentioned that this is
a tragedy in the Nuclear(deterrence) policy
as this has shaken the strategic stability the two superpowers have been building more than a half decade to bolster international peace and security.The problem couldn't be narrowed in quantity of a number of Tupokev destroyed and it's implications for the future of the Russian nuclear deterrent.As a result,the disastrous consequences hit the global world and could prompt a III world War.Most significantly,Kiev couldn't dare attack the Russian air-base leg if western agencies were not entirely involved,probably the US and British agents not forcibly officially.Such Ukrainian acts seem after a glimpse as childish as kids igniting fire in oil.
I agree with your analysis that Russias nuclear deterrent wasn’t much hurt. Some, but not much. What was hit was the terrorbombing with Kinzahl rockets. Which was the everyday terrorbombing Russia did,and definitely planned to continue with. That probably was the realistic goal and it was achieved.
Thank you, Mr. Hoffmann, for clarifying this topic. I hope that the Western leadership understands that too. Ukraine is 100% entitled to strike these active Russian bomber fleets. Pure self-defence.
Thank you for the article, fils a gap in the narrative regarding operation Spiderweb.
Glad you liked it and hope it can help!
Thank you for this analysis. It would be great to hear in a future post what your assessment is of the impact of last week’s attack on Russia’s use of cruise missiles.
Thanks awfully Sir Hoffman for your insightful perspective about a much harder issue and a significantly strategic aspect of the nuclear deterrent of a superpower and the first ranked one worldwide.It's worth mentioned that this is
a tragedy in the Nuclear(deterrence) policy
as this has shaken the strategic stability the two superpowers have been building more than a half decade to bolster international peace and security.The problem couldn't be narrowed in quantity of a number of Tupokev destroyed and it's implications for the future of the Russian nuclear deterrent.As a result,the disastrous consequences hit the global world and could prompt a III world War.Most significantly,Kiev couldn't dare attack the Russian air-base leg if western agencies were not entirely involved,probably the US and British agents not forcibly officially.Such Ukrainian acts seem after a glimpse as childish as kids igniting fire in oil.
I agree with your analysis that Russias nuclear deterrent wasn’t much hurt. Some, but not much. What was hit was the terrorbombing with Kinzahl rockets. Which was the everyday terrorbombing Russia did,and definitely planned to continue with. That probably was the realistic goal and it was achieved.